The Aim of this Blog Site

The aim of this blog is to examine cultural events and trends and to interpret them
within the framework of the authoritative and literal interpretation of Scripture

Monday, January 30, 2023

WHAT JUDE TELLS US: INTRODUCTION

Before beginning the study of the Epistle of Jude, it is necessary to provide some introductory notes:

The Author

There are 6 Judas’ mentioned in the New Testament. Two of them were named among the apostles: (1) Judas Iscariot and (2) Judas not Iscariot (John 14:22) who is also called Judas, son of James (Luke 6:16; Acts 1:13). In Matthew 10:3 and Mark 3:18 there is a mention of a Thaddaeus. Many think that this Judas may have changed his name or used another name following the death of Judas Iscariot in order to avoid the indignity attached to the name Judas. (3) The brother of Jesus, Matthew 13:55; Mark 6:3; (4) Judas of Galilee, Acts 5:37; (5) Judas of Damascus, Acts 9:11; (6) Judas surnamed Barsabas, Acts 15:22, 27.

The author does not identify himself as an apostle and even seems to set himself apart from the original twelve (v.17). Instead, he declares that he is the brother of James, the writer of the Epistle of James. He was the most prominent James of the early Church era having been the head of the Jerusalem Church (cf. Acts 12:17; 15:13; 21:18), he was the half-brother of Jesus. It is more than likely that this Jude is also a half-brother of our Lord Jesus Christ.1

Date of Writing

Since there is no allusion to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., Jude could have written between 65-69 A.D. However, the Apostle John wrote in the late 90’s A.D. and never alludes to the event in his writings. Therefore, it is possible that Jude may have been written as late as 90 A.D. 

Recipients

Jude writes to the same audience as did his brother James—the 12 tribes scattered abroad in the Diaspora. It has come to be known as one of the General Epistles since it was not addressed directly to one specific church. “To those who are the called, beloved in God the Father, and kept for Jesus Christ” (v.1). Most likely those of the Diaspora were in the regions which Peter had also written: Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia (1 Peter 1:1).

Purpose

Unlike James, who wrote to correct doctrinal errors, Jude wrote to warn of the apostasy of the false teachers of Gnosticism and to encourage his readers to contend earnestly for the faith (v.3). E.C. Pentecost explains:

Gnosticism declared that the spirit was good and the material was evil. Therefore the spiritual was to be cultivated and fed, with freedom to pursue its good inclinations. In addition Gnostics felt free to give vent to the desires of the flesh. Thus the heart of this apostasy was that it turned the grace of God into license and lasciviousness. Jude wrote to warn of this dual apostasy of wrong conduct and false doctrine.2

This short epistle is precisely what is needed today in the 21st Century Church of Jesus Christ. Christianity is under an assault by the apostate false teachers who intend to syncretize faith in Jesus Christ with the dictates of the secular humanist culture and thus lead astray believers from fulfilling God’s divine plan for their lives.

Similarity to 2nd Peter

Most scholars agree that Jude was written before Peter wrote his 2nd epistle since there are similar issues expressed in each. But Lenski is probably correct when he suggests that Jude uses 2 Peter since Peter uses the future tense regarding the false teachers who will bring in destructive heresies denying the Master (2:1) and that the scoffers will come (3:3). Whereas Jude speaks of these things as having already occurred—certain persons have crept in and deny our only Master (v.4) and repeating what Peter had prophesied of the scoffers (v.18).3

Similarities of Jude and 2 Peter

A Note about the Extra-Biblical References in Verses 9, 14 & 15

Jude quotes from The Assumption of Moses and The Book of Enoch. These two books come from a compilation of writings known as the Pseudepigrapha4—non-canonical writings that have been rejected by Roman Catholics as well as Protestants.5 The fact that Jude quotes from these Pseudepigrapha books does not imply that these books in their entirety were inspired by the Holy Spirit.

There are other instances where Biblical writers have used non-canonical writings. The Apostle Paul and Luke quoted from extra-Biblical sources. In 1 Cor. 15:33 Paul quoted the Greek dramatist Menander (c. 341–290 BC), “Bad company corrupts good morals.” In 2 Timothy 3:8, Paul mentioned Jannes and Jambres who do not appear in the Old Testament, but according to Jewish tradition they were court magicians of the Pharaoh who opposed Moses. Also in Titus 1:12 Paul quotes from Epimenides of Crete (6th Century B.C.), “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” And Luke in Acts 17:28 records Paul quoting from the Cilician poet Aratus (c. 315-240B.C.) “For we also are His children.” 

However, that which Jude, Luke and Paul wrote is considered inspired by the Holy Spirit and therefore regarded as absolute truth. Dr. Wuest sums this up:

All of which means that since we regard the Epistle of Jude part of the canonical scriptures, and therefore verbally inspired, and because the author treats the subject matter as fact, we are to regard it as such.6

It can therefore be concluded that non-Biblical writings used by the inspired authors of the Scriptures in no way asserts that the Holy Spirit inspired these non-Biblical writings in their entirety. And yet, whatever materials the authors of the Scriptures wrote under the direction of the Holy Spirit becomes the inspired Word of God.



[1] Mayor, J.B. (1990). The Expositor’s Greek Testament (W. Robertson Nicoll, Ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 5.226.

[2] Pentecost, E. C. (1985). Jude. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 2.918.

[3] Lenski, R.C.H. (2001). Commentary on the New Testament, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 11.597-598.

[4] The “Pseudepigrapha” contains works that falsely claim authorship to noted authorities.

[5] Geisler, Norman (2002). Systematic Theology, Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, 1.517.

[6] Wuest, K. S. (1997). Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: for the English Reader. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 16.246.

 

 

© 2023 David M. Rossi

 




Wednesday, January 18, 2023

THE NORMAL LIFE - REVISITED

What is a normal life?
How is a normal life to be defined?
Better yet, who defines what a normal life is?
The dictionary definition of normal states that this descriptive adjective means:

Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type.1

So if a normal life is one which conforms to a norm or standard of living, then who or what establishes the norms and standards?

Our culture here in the United States, in a vigorously unconstrained manner has rapidly moved towards a secularist humanist society. Dr. Norman Geisler describes secular humanism as “the de facto established religion of the land.”2 This was the result of a Supreme Court decision that struck down a Louisiana Law requiring balanced treatment for Creation when evolution was taught.3 Humanism was an established religion from its inception.4 The following are a few of its points which are relevant to this subject:

Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created; Humanism believes that man is a part of nature and that he has emerged as a result of a continuous process; Humanism asserts that the nature of the universe depicted by modern science makes unacceptable any supernatural or cosmic guarantees of human values.5

We now live in a society that repudiates all Godly influence, a society that repudiates, disavows and rejects any and all Christian influence of morals and values. These secularists are subversive anarchists. They will not be satisfied until the God of the universe is wiped out of the minds and memories of every man, woman and child. The Apostle Paul mentions these individuals as those “who suppress the truth in unrighteousness.”6 For that is exactly what they are doing, suppressing the truth about the God of this universe and the normal life which He provides.

Christians demonstrate their lack of Biblical knowledge by taking the attitude that we should “live and let live”; they truly don’t know what they are allowing to happen in our culture. For believers to think, as the secularist does, that they have the ‘right’ to destroy the principles of our nation’s foundation so that they can ‘do their thing’ without any moral restraints, is dangerously foolish.

But the most devastating failure is that a clear and united Christian refutation has not emerged. It is why it was asserted by Dr. Francis Schaeffer that the Christian consensus in our culture has become a memory. He warned,

As the memory of the Christian consensus which gave us freedom within the biblical form increasingly is forgotten, a manipulating authoritarianism will tend to fill the vacuum.7

This “manipulating authoritarianism” has instigated a determined effort in our culture to accept what they call alternative lifestyles as normal. By this is meant that if a person is homosexual, lesbian, transgender, or anything other than heterosexual, then these alternate lifestyles are to be considered normal, and are no longer to be referred to as “alternative” lifestyles. They are normal, period! And those who refuse to acknowledge this as “normal” will encounter social and legal consequences. It is why many Christian denominations have capitulated to this authoritarian secularism in order to gain acceptance within the culture—serving man instead of God.

The motivation behind this authoritarianism is based purely upon a subjective belief that one should be allowed to do whatever they feel like doing; or to be whatever they want to be. And no one should advise against what they want or (heaven forbid) say that it is wrong, sinful or immoral. The Bible warns against subjective thinking:

There is a way which seems right to a man,

But its end is the way of death. (Proverbs 14:12)

Now consider the objective truth based on Scripture, any lifestyle that is devoid of Christ as the center of a person’s life that truly is an alternative lifestyle. It is not the life which God has intended for all of mankind.

In contrast, the normal life which God intended is the Divine ideal lifestyle designed for each man, woman and child—a life with God, our Creator at the center of our lives. It is an eternal life, one that begins with belief in Jesus Christ, the One who eliminated the barrier of sin between us and God, by His bearing of our sins on the cross. It is a relationship based on our love for God, as Jesus proclaimed:

“And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.” (Mark 12:30; cf. Deuteronomy 6:5)

A relationship bonded by peace,

And the peace of God, which surpasses all comprehension, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus. (Philippians 4:7)

A harmonious rapport with God, with others and within oneself. It is what the Apostle Paul meant when he exhorted the Philippians to be of the same mind:

Therefore if there is any encouragement in Christ, if there is any consolation of love, if there is any fellowship of the Spirit, if any affection and compassion, make my joy complete by being of the same mind, maintaining the same love, united in spirit, intent on one purpose. (Philippians 2:1–2)

Our one purpose at this time in history should be to proclaim and demonstrate this Divine ideal lifestyle which is offered to “whoever believes in Him” (John 3:16). Therefore we need to speak up loud and clear about the ultimate benefit that those who believe in Christ “shall not perish, but have eternal life.”8 And that His ideal/normal life, this eternal life which He bestows does not begin after death, but it begins at the moment of faith in Jesus Christ. We can experience this ideal life today, for Jesus Christ stated that “I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.” (John 10:10b).

We dare not as Christians stand by idly and allow the secularists to define a normal life as a life without God, without Christ, without eternal life, that ultimately dooms men for all eternity.

“He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.” (John 3:36)

So what should be our course of action?

Take up signs and protest on the street corners? No!

Burn down and destroy the opposition? No!

We must return to the basics: With much prayer and increasing our knowledge of Bible Doctrine; living exemplary lives with Christ at the center; trusting in the God who controls the universe and history; relying on the Holy Spirit to work in our lives and fellow believers to become effectual witnesses for the gospel of salvation. For only the salvation of the opposition will reverse this evil trend in our culture. It may not be totally stamped out, but by the grace of God, the religion of secular humanism could itself become a memory.



[1] The American Heritage College Dictionary, p.948

[2] Geisler, Norman & Turek, Frank (1998). Legislating Morality, Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, p.91.

[3] See: Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/ [Retrieved January 18, 2023]

[5] Geisler & Turek, p.77

[6] Romans 1:18

[7] Schaeffer, Francis A. (1985). The Complete Works of Francis A. Schaeffer, Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 5.243

[8] John 3:16

 

© 2023 David M. Rossi