The third issue John considers concerns the fundamental truth about the exact nature of the Son of God—the foundation for the believer’s meaningful fellowship with Jesus Christ.
The Person of Jesus Christ
In laying the groundwork for this truth, John informs the believer of the heresy of Gnosticism. In John’s day, the Gnostics infiltrated the early church with the claim that Jesus Christ in His humanity was not true deity. John dispels their false teachings, affirming that the Gnostic teacher “is not from God” (4:3). Without mentioning the Gnostic sect by name, John characterizes them as antichrists (2:18) and false prophets (4:1). He proclaimed that “This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son” (2:22; 4:3).
It is important to distinguish the precise composition of Jesus Christ: He had a body (Matthew 26:26), a soul (John 12:27), and a spirit (Luke 23:46). For this reason, John defends his position that Jesus Christ is true God and true man, indivisible in hypostatic union, by declaring His deity and His humanity. At the outset he asserts His divine nature “was from the beginning” and “was with the Father” (1:1–2). This is the exact manner in which John opened his gospel account: “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God” (John 1:1–2). And John affirmed Jesus’ humanity: “And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us” (John 1:14). Even our Lord’s disciples believed and proclaimed His deity: Martha, “You are the Christ, the Son of God” (John 11:27); Thomas, “My Lord and My God!” (John 20:28); Peter, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matthew 16:16).
The Error of Our Day
There is a movement today within some Christian alliances that have become careless in pursuing accuracy in biblical interpretation. The attitude seems to be that the analysis of Scripture can and should be determined based upon each believer’s own personal understanding of what it means to them. Ryrie cautioned that “Even good Christians can fall into the trap of trying to mold God according to one’s own thinking or wishes or pleasure.”1 This method of understanding Scripture is what the apostle Peter warned against:
But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation.”(2 Peter 1:20)
What this approach generates is multiple meanings of God’s Word—many that are false create division and confusion among believers. Since God is not a God of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33) He has developed a system for believers to attain the divine viewpoint of His Word. The apostle Paul explained this precisely:
And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of service, to the building up of the body of Christ; until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ. (Ephesians 4:11–13)
Note that in the original Greek the “pastors and teachers” refers to one individual—the pastor–teacher of the local church. Thus, God designed for the local church to have a pastor who would teach biblical truth accurately, so that the congregation would comprehend with all believers the absolute interpretation of God’s Word (Ephesians 3:18f).
Trinity Distinctions
John understood that in his day the Gnostics taught false doctrines—specifically, the false teachings of the person and works of Jesus Christ. And today, we are confronted with a similar problem: the erroneous interpretation of the persons of the God–head—the Trinity. Thus producing confusion among believers and misleading many into incorrect practices. White explains that “many Christians, without knowing it, hold a false view of the Trinity simply due to their inability to articulate the difference between believing in one Being of God and three persons sharing that one Being.”2 This is a reasonable point, since the doctrine of the Trinity is a very difficult concept for many believers to comprehend. White continues:
As a result, even orthodox Christian believers slip into an ancient heresy known by many names: modalism, Sabellianism, Patripassionism. Today this same error is called Oneness or the “Jesus Only” position. Whatever its name might be, it is a denial of the Trinity based upon a denial of the distinction between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.3
Those who advocate the “Oneness or the ‘Jesus Only’ position” are the ones who overlook the function of each member of the Trinity. In particular, when it comes to prayer, the correct order of prayer is to address our prayers to the Father, as our Lord instructed: “Our Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 6:9). He reaffirmed this three times (John 14:13; 15:16; 16:23) stipulating that the effectiveness of our prayers is achieved when we ask the Father “in My name.” The correct order of prayer is essential because when we ask the Father in the name of Jesus Christ we are recognizing that the Father is the provider of all our needs (Philippians 4:19) and the Son, Jesus Christ, is our designated “Advocate with the Father” (1 John 2:1), the One Who “always lives to make intercession” on our behalf (Hebrews 7:25).
Emphatic Conclusion
As the 1st Century drew to a close, John advocated sound doctrinal teaching, consistently dismissing the false teachings of the Gnostics. He staunchly asserted that “every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God; and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist” (1 John 4:2–3).
Today, it is essential that the 21st Century Church follow John’s example and reject the doctrinal errors concerning our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ—“the true God and eternal life” (1 John 5:20).
[1] Charles Caldwell Ryrie, A Survey of Bible Doctrine (Chicago: Moody Press, 1972), p. 24.
[2] James R. White, The Forgotten Trinity (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, 1998), p. 153.
[3] Ibid, p. 153.



